Skip to content
Charles Ross

#12Charles Ross

RB·Rice·20131.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Charles Ross is a Explosive Back for Rice. Charles's 2013 season ranks in the 65th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 186 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Charles Ross's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Rushing
1280 Rush yards15 Rush TD211 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions37 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency65
  • Volume66
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency47
  • Receiving11
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)65th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency47th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.46 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Houston (SP+ 5).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4600.46Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Kansas: +0.02 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Houston: +0.46 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs UTSA: -0.25 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs New Mexico State: +0.11 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UTEP: +0.34 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs North Texas: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.45 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UAB: -0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tulane: +0.10 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Marshall: +0.31 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: -0.23 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Texas A&ML31-5220.4191075.6222410.29
3vsKansasW23-14-9.7271575.812-100.02
4vsHoustonL26-314.99556.1111400.46
7@UTSAW27-21-6.611595.40-0.25
8@New Mexico StateW45-19-35.1261676.410.11
9vsUTEPW45-7-28.9211527.210.34
10@North TexasL16-281.0181015.600.06
12vsLouisiana TechW52-14-16.8272158.050.45
13@UABW37-34-20.810505.01-0.07
14vsTulaneW17-13-8.015805.300.10
15vsMarshallW41-248.3181096.120.31
1vsMississippi StateL7-4410.710282.81-0.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.2%
Passing plays
1.4%
Rushing plays
34.9%
Standard downs
26.8%
Passing downs
15.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.530−0.32
EPA per play · 2013 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.