Skip to content
Caleb McMillan

#5Caleb McMillan

Caleb McMillan is a Versatile WR for Marshall. Caleb's 2023 season produced 14.8 total EPA across 32 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Caleb McMillan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
18 Receptions275 Rec yards2 Rec TD15.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume15
  • Explosiveness55
  • Consistency73
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.77 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.63 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Georgia Southern (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
JoJo NatsonUtah State0.3901.019.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.6302.63Wk 2 vs East Carolina: +1.42 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: -0.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Old Dominion: +2.06 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs NC State: -0.40 EPA/play6Wk 10 vs App State: +0.78 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia Southern: +2.63 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Alabama: +1.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arkansas State: +0.75 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2@East CarolinaW31-13-12.848521.31751.42
4vsVirginia TechW24-175.811212.0012-0.08
5vsOld DominionW41-35-10.114040.00402.06
6@NC StateL41-487.42178.5015-0.40
10@App StateL9-313.83289.30150.78
11vsGeorgia SouthernW38-33-5.21-1-1.0002.63
12@South AlabamaL0-285.111111.00111.18
13vsArkansas StateW35-21-6.323919.51210.75
20vsUTSAL17-355.434414.7021

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.3%
Passing plays
10.9%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
5.2%
Passing downs
5.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
1.00
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 2.63

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.