Skip to content
Bo Nix

#10Bo Nix

QB·Auburn·20232022202020193.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Bo Nix is a 4-year Dual-Threat QB for Auburn. Bo's 2020 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 445 plays — a developing rate for the QB. Bo's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bo Nix's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2019

5-Star · Blue chip
Stars
247 composite
0.9856
National rank
#33
High school
Pinson Valley
Hometown
Pinson, AL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2020 Production

Passing
214/356 Comp/Att2414 Pass yards12 Pass TD7 INT60.1% Comp %
Rushing
388 Rush yards7 Rush TD108 Carries3.6 Yards/carry
Punting
3 Punts97 Punt yards32.3 Yards/punt39 Long2 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency70
  • Clutch71
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs LSU (SP+ 6).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 4 vs Kentucky: +0.61 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia: -0.05 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arkansas: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs South Carolina: +0.13 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ole Miss: +0.46 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs LSU: +0.94 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Tennessee: +0.20 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Alabama: +0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas A&M: +0.27 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Mississippi State: -0.01 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Northwestern: +0.25 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
4vsKentuckyW29-132.216/26233303400.61
5@GeorgiaL6-2719.121/401770180-0.05
6vsArkansasW30-281.617/28187103010.15
7@South CarolinaL22-30-2.424/47272136900.13
8@Ole MissW35-284.823/30238105210.46
9vsLSUW48-116.018/24299308110.94
12vsTennesseeW30-170.917/26220111000.20
13@AlabamaL13-4228.323/3822702-110.10
14vsTexas A&ML20-3116.215/23144004920.27
15@Mississippi StateW24-10-1.415/3212510241-0.01
1vsNorthwesternL19-359.025/42292103200.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.5%
Passing plays
98.4%
Rushing plays
23.7%
Standard downs
54.2%
Passing downs
77.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / 0.44

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.250−0.32202020222023
EPA per play · 2019 — 2023 · 51 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Auburn
5.6
200.8
2020Auburn
3.8
178.5
2022Oregon
11.2
278.6
2023Oregon
16.7
390.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.