Skip to content
Alexander Mattison
Alexander Mattison

#22Alexander Mattison

RB·Boise State·201820172.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Alexander Mattison is a 2-year Featured Back for Boise State. Alexander's 2018 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 308 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Alexander Mattison's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Rushing
1412 Rush yards17 Rush TD302 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions173 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.4 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns87 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume96
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency27
  • Receiving36
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UConn (SP+ -26).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7300.73Wk 1 vs Troy: -0.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UConn: +0.73 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oklahoma State: -0.24 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Wyoming: -0.19 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs San Diego State: +0.01 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nevada: -0.16 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Air Force: +0.50 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs BYU: +0.18 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Fresno State: +0.22 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs New Mexico: +0.39 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Utah State: -0.01 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Fresno State: +0.02 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@TroyW56-202.614564.01120-0.04
2vsUConnW62-7-26.41111510.521300.73
3@Oklahoma StateL21-4413.814503.60150-0.24
5@WyomingW34-141.920572.813150-0.19
6vsSan Diego StateL13-196.025662.621900.01
7@NevadaW31-27-0.524692.904280-0.16
8vsColorado StateW56-28-10.320854.31240
9@Air ForceW48-38-1.8221366.210.50
10vsBYUW21-166.225893.6254000.18
11vsFresno StateW24-1717.4301444.8231500.22
12@New MexicoW45-14-9.5201457.3134000.39
13vsUtah StateW33-2414.2372005.433120-0.01
14vsFresno StateL16-1917.4402005.010.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
33.7%
Passing plays
6.6%
Rushing plays
61.7%
Standard downs
41.0%
Passing downs
17.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.03
Pass / Rush EPA
0.09 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.830−0.402018
EPA per play · 2017 — 2018 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017Boise State
1.4
49.3
2018Boise State
2.8
77.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.