Skip to content
Alexander Mattison
Alexander Mattison

#22Alexander Mattison

RB·Boise State·201820171.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Alexander Mattison is a 2-year Committee Back for Boise State. Alexander's 2017 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 241 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Alexander Mattison's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
1086 Rush yards12 Rush TD212 Carries5.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions284 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume71
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving56
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.24 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.61 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Colorado State (SP+ 4).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6100.61Wk 1 vs Troy: -0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: +0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs New Mexico: -0.29 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Virginia: -0.08 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs BYU: -0.01 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs San Diego State: +0.19 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wyoming: -0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Utah State: +0.32 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Nevada: +0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Colorado State: +0.61 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Air Force: -0.17 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Fresno State: +0.13 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Fresno State: -0.14 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Oregon: +0.01 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsTroyW24-131.613826.311160-0.28
2@Washington StateL44-478.614634.5131200.04
3vsNew MexicoW28-14-12.46101.70190-0.29
4vsVirginiaL23-420.87111.602160-0.08
6@BYUW24-7-7.4291184.122150-0.01
7@San Diego StateW31-144.5231285.611900.19
8vsWyomingW24-14-2.517915.404410-0.04
9@Utah StateW41-14-3.3191105.8032810.32
10vsNevadaW41-14-16.412645.3211400.41
11@Colorado StateW59-523.92324210.5334400.61
12vsAir ForceW44-19-11.017422.502380-0.17
13@Fresno StateL17-28-2.715634.2133700.13
14vsFresno StateW17-14-2.714503.61250-0.14
1vsOregonW38-289.13124.000.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.8%
Passing plays
7.6%
Rushing plays
41.9%
Standard downs
30.1%
Passing downs
14.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
0.32 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.830−0.402018
EPA per play · 2017 — 2018 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017Boise State
1.4
49.3
2018Boise State
2.8
77.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.