Sat, Nov 15, 5:00 PM
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC | 17 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| TA&M | 3 | 0 | 21 | 7 | 31 |
Our model blends Elo ratings (TA&M Elo 1904, SC Elo 1637) plus home-field advantage. That projects TA&M -13.1 (83% to win) — 3.4 points of value on SC versus the market line of -16.5.
SC up 6 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,662 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
South Carolina 30, Texas A&M 31.
Yes — the model's pick (TA&M) was correct.
Why trust the number?Gridpex's model is walk-forward validated on 2014–24, out-of-sample: +0.28 pts mean Closing Line Value and 53.5% beat the close. We report the record and validate every pick against closing line value.
Called it — I had TA&M pregame. ✓ We log the misses too, but not this one.
Nick Barrett 17 Yd Fumble Return (William Joyce Kick)
(01:06) No Huddle-Shotgun #16 L.Sellers pass complete short right to #8 N.Harbor caught at USC35, for 80 yards to the TAMU00 TOUCHDOWN, clock 00:53, 1ST DOWN #24 M.Love kick attempt good (H: #15 C.Woods, LS: #46 C.Rasmussen)
(05:37) No Huddle-Shotgun #16 L.Sellers pass complete deep left to #4 V.Jacobs caught at TAMU06, for 50 yards to the TAMU00 TOUCHDOWN, clock 05:28, 1ST DOWN #45 W.Joyce kick attempt good (H: #24 M.Love, LS: #46 C.Rasmussen)
Team boards, recruiting & CFB talk — start a thread.
Open the boards →