Skip to content
Tyler Ervin

#7Tyler Ervin

RB·San José State·20151.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Tyler Ervin is a Featured Back for San José State. Tyler's 2015 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 339 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tyler Ervin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Rushing
1601 Rush yards13 Rush TD294 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
45 Receptions334 Rec yards2 Rec TD7.4 Yards/rec
Returns
25 Kick returns597 KR yards0 KR TD8 Punt returns105 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency34
  • Receiving62
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency34th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.36 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.64 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Air Force (SP+ 5).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Jeremy McNicholsBoise State0.3304.7112.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6400.64Wk 1 vs New Hampshire: +0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Air Force: +0.64 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon State: +0.11 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Fresno State: +0.60 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Auburn: +0.28 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UNLV: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs San Diego State: -0.38 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs New Mexico: +0.13 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs BYU: -0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Nevada: -0.19 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Hawai'i: +0.35 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Boise State: -0.13 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Georgia State: -0.02 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNew HampshireW43-13201276.3333400.30
2@Air ForceL16-374.71212110.1132810.64
3@Oregon StateL21-35-10.121934.4263000.11
4vsFresno StateW49-23-12.6423007.1344500.60
5@AuburnL21-3514.6271605.9111100.28
6@UNLVW33-27-16.218734.1187410.20
7vsSan Diego StateL7-308.017221.303-10-0.38
8vsNew MexicoW31-21-8.7362637.3121100.13
10vsBYUL16-178.723803.504130-0.16
11@NevadaL34-37-7.117643.80-0.19
12@Hawai'iW42-23-16.3201145.7166200.35
13vsBoise StateL23-4011.811524.704300-0.13
1vsGeorgia StateW27-16-6.7301324.401-30-0.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
37.3%
Passing plays
12.8%
Rushing plays
59.2%
Standard downs
44.5%
Passing downs
20.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.740−0.48
EPA per play · 2015 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.