Skip to content
Trace McSorley

#9Trace McSorley

QB·Penn State·2017201611.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Trace McSorley is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Penn State. Trace's 2016 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 509 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Trace McSorley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
224/387 Comp/Att3614 Pass yards29 Pass TD8 INT57.9% Comp %
Rushing
365 Rush yards7 Rush TD146 Carries2.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat36
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.26 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Michigan State (SP+ 7).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Kent State: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Pittsburgh: +0.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Temple: +0.42 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Michigan: +0.03 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Minnesota: +0.41 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Maryland: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Ohio State: +0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Purdue: +0.47 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Iowa: +0.38 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Indiana: +0.55 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rutgers: +0.06 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: +0.79 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wisconsin: +0.63 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs USC: +0.63 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsKent StateW33-13-12.016/312092037.24700.18
2@PittsburghL39-4213.124/353321150.0-1700.16
3vsTempleW34-2711.918/242871169.1810.42
4@MichiganL10-4924.416/271211110.0-600.03
5vsMinnesotaW29-2612.619/413351073.77310.41
6vsMarylandW38-14-0.610/191522074.88110.41
8vsOhio StateW24-2122.48/231541030.96310.04
9@PurdueW62-24-11.012/232283069.8200.47
10vsIowaW41-1410.311/182402079.34010.38
11@IndianaW45-314.616/303322284.71310.55
12@RutgersW39-0-14.917/332101038.45500.06
13vsMichigan StateW45-127.417/233764093.41300.79
14vsWisconsinW38-3116.122/313844093.7-2000.63
1vsUSCL49-5223.618/292544365.11310.63

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
56.0%
Passing plays
98.8%
Rushing plays
24.0%
Standard downs
47.2%
Passing downs
75.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.200−0.072017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Penn State
11.2
301.2
2017Penn State
12.7
321.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.