Skip to content
Teriyon Gipson

#7Teriyon Gipson

RB·New Mexico·20163.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Teriyon Gipson is a Explosive Back for New Mexico. Teriyon's 2016 season ranks in the 90th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 149 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Teriyon Gipson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1269 Rush yards13 Rush TD145 Carries8.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions80 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.9 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns127 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume61
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency77
  • Receiving52
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.60 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.64 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs South Dakota.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Devon JohnsonMarshall0.5206.0108.2
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6401.64Wk 1 vs South Dakota: +1.64 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs New Mexico State: +0.67 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs San José State: +0.70 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Air Force: +1.33 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UL Monroe: +0.65 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Hawai'i: +0.34 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Nevada: +0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Utah State: +0.60 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Colorado State: +0.05 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wyoming: +1.25 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs UTSA: -0.02 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSouth DakotaW48-21818122.621701.64
2@New Mexico StateL31-32-17.212625.2242800.67
5vsSan José StateW48-41-13.61115614.210.70
7vsAir ForceW45-404.4914015.6111211.33
8vsUL MonroeW59-17-21.388410.510.65
9@Hawai'iW28-21-10.117734.3121500.34
10vsNevadaW35-26-13.0201216.100.14
11@Utah StateW24-21-4.4181075.920.60
12@Colorado StateL31-490.815684.500.05
13vsWyomingW56-35-6.91321716.721.25
1vsUTSAW23-20-11.214604.311180-0.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
21.2%
Passing plays
6.1%
Rushing plays
25.6%
Standard downs
22.2%
Passing downs
18.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.59
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.94 / 0.55

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.810−0.19
EPA per play · 2016 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.