Skip to content
Skyler Howard

#3Skyler Howard

QB·West Virginia·201620156.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Skyler Howard is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for West Virginia. Skyler's 2016 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 521 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Skyler Howard's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
247/404 Comp/Att3328 Pass yards26 Pass TD10 INT61.1% Comp %
Rushing
463 Rush yards10 Rush TD142 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat90
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Iowa State (SP+ 1).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs Missouri: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Youngstown State: +0.69 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs BYU: +0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kansas State: +0.20 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Texas Tech: +0.57 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs TCU: +0.40 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma State: +0.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Kansas: +0.49 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas: +0.21 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Oklahoma: +0.10 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Iowa State: +0.85 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Baylor: +0.05 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.02 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMissouriW26-11-1.023/352530167.13500.20
2vsYoungstown StateW38-2120/333895194.65000.69
4vsBYUW35-328.031/403321175.72710.26
5vsKansas StateW17-168.224/412981153.3-600.20
7@Texas TechW48-173.721/313181088.48920.57
8vsTCUW34-1011.016/232314079.9500.40
9@Oklahoma StateL20-3716.424/392121238.0-1710.18
10vsKansasW48-21-15.916/272603095.86420.49
11@TexasW24-2010.621/352691353.62700.21
12vsOklahomaL28-5626.112/271912133.05220.10
13@Iowa StateW49-190.712/213305095.64800.85
14vsBaylorW24-2111.310/261112028.52610.05
1vsMiamiL14-3118.617/261340028.96310.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
54.6%
Passing plays
98.6%
Rushing plays
21.4%
Standard downs
49.9%
Passing downs
65.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.950−0.292016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015West Virginia
4.2
200.8
2016West Virginia
6.4
216.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.