#30Rashad Amos

RB·Georgia State·2025

Rashad Amos is a Committee Back for Georgia State. Rashad's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 79 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rashad Amos's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

267 Rush yards2 Rush TD63 Carries4.2 Yards/carry

Receiving

10 Receptions70 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume34
Explosiveness24
Consistency0
Receiving66

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.38 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Murray State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	@Ole Miss	L7-63	24.0	9	69	7.7	0	—	—	—	0.16
2	vsMemphis	L16-38	7.6	6	15	2.5	0	3	31	0	0.06
3	vsMurray State	W37-21	—	11	56	5.1	1	—	—	—	0.38
4	@Vanderbilt	L21-70	20.3	5	25	5.0	0	3	22	0	-0.05
6	vsJames Madison	L7-14	12.3	11	30	2.7	0	1	7	0	-0.04
7	vsApp State	L20-41	-11.4	3	18	6.0	0	1	4	0	0.27
8	@Georgia Southern	L24-41	-9.4	9	29	3.2	1	2	6	0	0.21
9	vsSouth Alabama	L31-38	-12.7	7	26	3.7	0	—	—	—	-0.15
12	vsMarshall	L18-30	-4.5	2	-1	-0.5	0	—	—	—	-0.62

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

11.8%

Passing plays

4.3%

Rushing plays

22.4%

Standard downs

14.4%

Passing downs

6.8%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.01
Passing downs: 0.42
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.06 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).