Skip to content
Rachaad White

#3Rachaad White

RB·Arizona State·20212.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Rachaad White is a Pass-Catching Back for Arizona State. Rachaad's 2021 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 200 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rachaad White's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
1006 Rush yards15 Rush TD182 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
43 Receptions456 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.6 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns25 KR yards0 KR TD1 Punt returns36 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume88
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency75
  • Receiving91
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.93 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Southern Utah.

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9300.93Wk 1 vs Southern Utah: +0.93 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UNLV: +0.19 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs BYU: +0.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Colorado: +0.32 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UCLA: +0.64 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Stanford: -0.08 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Utah: +0.15 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs USC: +0.49 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Washington: +0.68 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Oregon State: +0.15 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona: +0.19 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSouthern UtahW41-147649.1211100.93
2vsUNLVW37-10-13.822904.1254100.19
3@BYUL17-278.915714.7196500.13
4vsColoradoW35-13-10.011373.4157010.32
5@UCLAW42-239.49697.7233800.64
6vsStanfordW28-10-10.213967.41110-0.08
7@UtahL21-3515.29566.2032500.15
10vsUSCW31-16-0.6282027.2323500.49
11@WashingtonW35-30-0.7321845.8255300.68
12@Oregon StateL10-248.915392.6068600.15
13vsArizonaW38-15-12.621984.7133100.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.7%
Passing plays
15.3%
Rushing plays
41.0%
Standard downs
34.1%
Passing downs
21.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.86
Pass / Rush EPA
0.71 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.18
EPA per play · 2021 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.