Skip to content
Quinton Flowers

#9Quinton Flowers

QB·South Florida·2017201620158.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Quinton Flowers is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for South Florida. Quinton's 2017 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 534 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Quinton Flowers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
188/354 Comp/Att2911 Pass yards25 Pass TD6 INT53.1% Comp %
Rushing
1078 Rush yards11 Rush TD196 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Returns
1 Kick returns20 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat87
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.16 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.60 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs UConn (SP+ -19).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6000.60Wk 1 vs Stony Brook: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs San José State: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Illinois: +0.37 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Temple: +0.09 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs East Carolina: +0.52 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Cincinnati: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tulane: +0.40 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Houston: +0.34 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UConn: +0.60 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Tulsa: +0.03 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UCF: +0.56 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Texas Tech: +0.38 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsStony BrookW31-1719/321862141.76700.06
1@San José StateW42-22-20.011/222122073.57010.06
3vsIllinoisW47-23-7.415/272804168.510610.37
4vsTempleW43-70.58/20960023.45920.09
5@East CarolinaW61-31-14.010/181602097.19310.52
7vsCincinnatiW33-3-6.416/291840062.18010.28
8@TulaneW34-28-5.710/241272194.513810.40
9vsHoustonL24-287.723/383250047.5720.34
10@UConnW37-20-19.224/373853195.313100.60
12vsTulsaW27-20-10.711/281422148.411900.03
13@UCFL42-4914.124/455034183.810210.56
1vsTexas TechW38-344.817/343114089.810610.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.6%
Passing plays
96.3%
Rushing plays
29.3%
Standard downs
44.2%
Passing downs
73.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.52
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.780−0.2220162017
EPA per play · 2015 — 2017 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015South Florida
6.1
194.8
2016South Florida
11.4
270.8
2017South Florida
8.0
228.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.