Skip to content
Quinton Flowers

#9Quinton Flowers

QB·South Florida·20172016201511.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Quinton Flowers is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for South Florida. Quinton's 2016 season ranks in the 65th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 456 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Quinton Flowers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
207/331 Comp/Att2812 Pass yards24 Pass TD7 INT62.5% Comp %
Rushing
1530 Rush yards18 Rush TD198 Carries7.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency65
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch60
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)65th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.21 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.70 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Memphis (SP+ 8).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7000.70Wk 1 vs Towson: +0.55 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Illinois: +0.57 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Syracuse: +0.06 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida State: +0.32 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Cincinnati: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs East Carolina: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UConn: +0.32 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Temple: +0.63 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Navy: +0.57 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Memphis: +0.70 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs SMU: +0.57 EPA/play12Wk 1 vs South Carolina: +0.37 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsTowsonW56-208/181782185.34620.55
2vsNorthern IllinoisW48-17-2.421/333504092.75300.57
3@SyracuseW45-20-2.712/241881045.85100.06
4vsFlorida StateL35-5524.05/141601232.515900.32
5@CincinnatiW45-20-3.616/261960085.77420.26
6vsEast CarolinaW38-22-9.021/292503084.111500.41
7vsUConnW42-27-11.623/372132291.515730.32
8@TempleL30-4611.911/191872087.79010.63
9vsNavyW52-456.819/292192098.617620.57
11@MemphisW49-427.724/292632097.721030.70
12@SMUW35-27-10.87/151953180.814200.57
13vsUCFW48-31-2.217/261520064.41522
1vsSouth CarolinaW46-39-4.023/322612192.310530.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
55.9%
Passing plays
91.4%
Rushing plays
33.5%
Standard downs
53.7%
Passing downs
61.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.64

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.780−0.2220162017
EPA per play · 2015 — 2017 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015South Florida
6.1
194.8
2016South Florida
11.4
270.8
2017South Florida
8.0
228.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.