Skip to content
P.J. Wells

#13P.J. Wells

P.J. Wells is a Slot Specialist WR for Jacksonville State.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So P.J. Wells's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
12 Receptions72 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume10
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency40
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency40th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (88th percentile).
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.55 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.99 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Liberty (SP+ 0).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
Nick NashSan José State0.3100.514.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9900.99Wk 2 vs Louisville: -0.20 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.35 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Kennesaw State: -0.16 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs New Mexico State: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Liberty: +0.99 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2@LouisvilleL14-4913.6263.004-0.20
3@Eastern MichiganL34-37-13.35316.20120.35
6@Kennesaw StateW63-24-25.1144.004-0.16
7vsNew Mexico StateW54-13-19.0166.0060.10
10@LibertyW31-210.222412.00150.99
11@Louisiana TechW44-37-11.6111.001

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.4%
Passing plays
9.4%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.5%
Passing downs
5.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.75
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.