Skip to content
Nick Stevens

#7Nick Stevens

QB·Colorado State·20179.5 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Nick Stevens is a Dual-Threat QB for Colorado State. Nick's 2017 season ranks in the 68th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 495 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nick Stevens's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
284/459 Comp/Att3799 Pass yards29 Pass TD10 INT61.9% Comp %
Rushing
123 Rush yards4 Rush TD54 Carries2.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency68
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat83
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)68th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 11 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Hawai'i (SP+ -20).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2701.27Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.63 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Oregon State: +0.63 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Abilene Christian: +0.40 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Alabama: +0.45 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Hawai'i: +1.27 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Utah State: +0.63 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nevada: +0.64 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs New Mexico: +0.43 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Air Force: +0.08 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wyoming: +0.42 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boise State: +0.48 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs San José State: +0.41 EPA/play12Wk 1 vs Marshall: +0.15 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsColoradoL3-172.024/473090225.7-1300.63
1vsOregon StateW58-27-12.626/393343177.3600.63
2vsAbilene ChristianW38-1025/403373184.04100.40
3@AlabamaL23-4133.521/382472273.22610.45
5@Hawai'iW51-21-19.718/223514099.11301.27
6@Utah StateW27-14-3.322/312932092.8200.63
7vsNevadaW44-42-16.426/373844091.1200.64
8@New MexicoW27-24-12.417/332312063.4-700.43
9vsAir ForceL28-45-11.017/312692357.31300.08
10@WyomingL13-16-2.58/141100062.11700.42
11vsBoise StateL52-599.129/43309211110.48
12vsSan José StateW42-14-20.026/323053091.72800.41
1vsMarshallL28-31-4.525/523202055.8-1620.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
51.7%
Passing plays
100.0%
Rushing plays
8.5%
Standard downs
42.8%
Passing downs
70.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.70
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.390−0.04
EPA per play · 2017 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.