Skip to content
Nick Fitzgerald

#7Nick Fitzgerald

QB·Mississippi State·201820167.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Nick Fitzgerald is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Mississippi State. Nick's 2016 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 520 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nick Fitzgerald's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
196/361 Comp/Att2423 Pass yards21 Pass TD10 INT54.3% Comp %
Rushing
1375 Rush yards16 Rush TD195 Carries7.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency57
  • Clutch59
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.37 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.14 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Ole Miss (SP+ 12).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1401.14Wk 1 vs South Alabama: -0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Carolina: +0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs LSU: -0.14 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Massachusetts: +0.47 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Auburn: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs BYU: +0.05 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kentucky: +0.16 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Samford: +0.69 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas A&M: +0.30 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Alabama: -0.23 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arkansas: +0.68 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ole Miss: +1.14 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Miami (OH): +0.20 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSouth AlabamaL20-21-9.40/30001.8110-0.30
2vsSouth CarolinaW27-14-4.019/291782191.419500.30
3@LSUL20-2325.312/241200022.3130-0.14
4@MassachusettsW47-35-15.326/393053087.411000.47
6vsAuburnL14-3815.317/341812116.66100.20
7@BYUL21-288.017/362141263.34120.05
8@KentuckyL38-40-2.613/21811162.910720.16
9vsSamfordW56-4120/354175287.111920.69
10vsTexas A&MW35-2812.018/312092283.118220.30
11@AlabamaL3-5131.710/33145019.3150-0.23
12vsArkansasL42-587.923/333282092.313140.68
13@Ole MissW55-2012.48/171093099.325821.14
1vsMiami (OH)W17-16-6.113/261360069.213220.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
58.2%
Passing plays
88.0%
Rushing plays
34.9%
Standard downs
52.1%
Passing downs
72.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.39
Pass / Rush EPA
0.18 / 0.63

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.280−0.442018
EPA per play · 2016 — 2018 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Mississippi State
7.4
230.9
2018Mississippi State
4.5
199.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.