Skip to content
Mohamed Ibrahim

#24Mohamed Ibrahim

RB·Minnesota·2022202020186.7 pts line value1st Round

Mohamed Ibrahim is a 3-year Featured Back for Minnesota. Mohamed's 2020 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 198 plays — a average rate for the RB. Mohamed's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mohamed Ibrahim's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
1076 Rush yards15 Rush TD201 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions56 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns47 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency82
  • Receiving22
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.48 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Illinois (SP+ -5).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6
DeWayne McBrideUAB0.4205.8101.6
RJ HarveyUCF0.4706.9113.7
Tyjae SpearsTulane0.4505.7105.3
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4800.48Wk 8 vs Michigan: +0.29 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Maryland: +0.27 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Illinois: +0.48 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Iowa: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Purdue: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 15 vs Nebraska: +0.40 EPA/play15Wk 16 vs Wisconsin: +0.01 EPA/play16
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
8vsMichiganL24-4910.7261405.4241700.29
9@MarylandL44-45-0.1412075.040.27
10@IllinoisW41-14-5.4302247.5423100.48
11vsIowaL7-3516.3331444.402800.06
12vsPurdueW34-315.9251024.130.29
15@NebraskaW24-177.7201085.420.40
16@WisconsinL17-2026.5261515.800.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
43.7%
Passing plays
5.2%
Rushing plays
69.8%
Standard downs
52.7%
Passing downs
19.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.28 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.950−0.3220202022
EPA per play · 2018 — 2022 · 29 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Minnesota
2.4
60.9
2020Minnesota
6.7
80.9
2022Minnesota
5.3
103.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.