Skip to content
Mavin Anderson

#3Mavin Anderson

Mavin Anderson is a Slot Specialist WR for California.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mavin Anderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
14 Receptions99 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume9
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency8
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency8th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (88th percentile).
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.43 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.77 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs UC Davis.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7701.77Wk 1 vs UC Davis: +1.77 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Auburn: +0.78 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs San Diego State: -1.10 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Miami: +0.04 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Pittsburgh: +0.06 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsUC DavisW31-134348.50191.77
2@AuburnW21-149.54317.80120.78
3vsSan Diego StateW31-10-15.4155.005-1.10
6vsMiamiL38-3921.6155.0050.04
7@PittsburghL15-174.93124.0090.06
20vsUNLVL13-249.311212.0012

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.0%
Passing plays
5.7%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.2%
Passing downs
4.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.13
Passing downs
-0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.