Skip to content
Mataeo Durant

#21Mataeo Durant

RB·Duke·20202.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Mataeo Durant is a Explosive Back for Duke. Mataeo's 2020 season ranks in the 60th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 120 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mataeo Durant's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
817 Rush yards8 Rush TD120 Carries6.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
12 Receptions107 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume45
  • Explosiveness76
  • Consistency49
  • Receiving35
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency49th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.16 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.26 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Boston College (SP+ 1).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2601.26Wk 2 vs Notre Dame: -0.47 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Boston College: +1.26 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Virginia: -0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia Tech: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Syracuse: +0.59 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs NC State: -0.18 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Charlotte: +0.65 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs North Carolina: +1.07 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs Georgia Tech: +0.36 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Miami: -0.19 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Florida State: +0.30 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2@Notre DameL13-2721.0571.40-0.47
3vsBoston CollegeL6-260.955911.811401.26
4@VirginiaL20-380.98324.00-0.27
5vsVirginia TechL31-3813.711867.800.31
6@SyracuseW38-24-9.8231637.120.59
7@NC StateL20-310.0791.303260-0.18
9vsCharlotteW53-19-6.6121048.720.65
10vsNorth CarolinaL24-5618.01113212.0122901.07
13@Georgia TechL33-56-1.015503.3134810.36
14vsMiamiL0-4812.810484.80300-0.19
15@Florida StateL35-56-4.9131279.810.30

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.8%
Passing plays
3.0%
Rushing plays
30.0%
Standard downs
18.4%
Passing downs
10.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
1.16
Pass / Rush EPA
0.90 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.430−0.65
EPA per play · 2020 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.