Skip to content
Mason Drube

#7Mason Drube

Mason Drube is a Clutch Passer for Wyoming. Mason's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 54 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mason Drube's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
20/38 Comp/Att187 Pass yards0 Pass TD1 INT52.6% Comp %
Rushing
21 Rush yards0 Rush TD16 Carries1.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume79
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency71
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0701.07Wk 12 vs Fresno State: -0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Nevada: -1.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Hawai'i: -0.03 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
12@Fresno StateL3-241.82/513003.960-0.29
13vsNevadaL7-13-13.41/1-5002.2-1.07
14@Hawai'iL7-271.717/321790122.0150-0.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.6%
Passing plays
36.4%
Rushing plays
16.5%
Standard downs
26.7%
Passing downs
28.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.26
Passing downs
0.13
Pass / Rush EPA
0.07 / -0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.