Skip to content
Marquise Williams
Marquise Williams

#12Marquise Williams

QB·North Carolina·201520147.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Marquise Williams is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for North Carolina. Marquise's 2014 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 582 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marquise Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
270/428 Comp/Att3068 Pass yards21 Pass TD9 INT63.1% Comp %
Rushing
788 Rush yards13 Rush TD193 Carries4.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat94
  • Consistency69
  • Clutch84
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.53 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs San Diego State (SP+ 1).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5300.53Wk 1 vs Liberty: +0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs San Diego State: +0.53 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs East Carolina: -0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Clemson: +0.42 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Virginia Tech: -0.02 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Notre Dame: +0.47 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: +0.51 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia: +0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Miami: -0.03 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: +0.44 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Duke: +0.46 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs NC State: -0.11 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Rutgers: +0.09 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsLibertyW56-2919/291692277.75220.27
2vsSan Diego StateW31-271.020/292552079.36300.53
4@East CarolinaL41-708.514/251270116.7370-0.13
5@ClemsonL35-5018.124/383454140.3-300.42
6vsVirginia TechL17-347.817/331871035.6940-0.02
7@Notre DameL43-5010.824/413032173.713210.47
8vsGeorgia TechW48-4311.238/473904188.47310.51
9@VirginiaW28-274.015/282592150.04910.13
10@MiamiL20-4713.922/321860110.692-0.03
12vsPittsburghW40-3514.123/402761085.212230.44
13@DukeW45-207.018/272762074.29820.46
14vsNC StateL7-358.111/22970119.4110-0.11
1vsRutgersL21-40-1.525/371981055.35110.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.1%
Passing plays
84.4%
Rushing plays
35.9%
Standard downs
55.4%
Passing downs
74.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.22 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.970−0.232015
EPA per play · 2014 — 2015 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014North Carolina
7.5
256.6
2015North Carolina
8.3
240.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.