#2Lamar Radcliffe

RB·San José State·2025

Lamar Radcliffe is a Committee Back for San José State. Lamar's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 71 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Lamar Radcliffe's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

340 Rush yards1 Rush TD66 Carries5.2 Yards/carry

Receiving

4 Receptions24 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume36
Explosiveness44
Consistency0
Receiving13

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.33 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 0.72 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Hawai'i (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	vsCentral Michigan	L14-16	-8.8	7	15	2.1	0	—	—	—	-0.36
2	@Texas	L7-38	16.2	5	16	3.2	0	—	—	—	-0.41
6	vsNew Mexico	W35-28	0.9	15	64	4.3	0	—	—	—	0.09
7	@Wyoming	L28-35	-11.3	7	29	4.1	0	—	—	—	0.14
8	@Utah State	L25-30	-3.1	13	74	5.7	0	1	15	1	0.01
10	vsHawai'i	W45-38	1.7	10	97	9.7	1	1	6	0	0.72
11	vsAir Force	L16-26	-3.2	4	24	6.0	0	2	3	0	0.31
12	@Nevada	L10-55	-13.4	5	21	4.2	0	—	—	—	-0.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

12.7%

Passing plays

0.9%

Rushing plays

31.6%

Standard downs

15.3%

Passing downs

7.3%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.08
Passing downs: 0.11
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.71 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).