Skip to content
Kyre Duplessis

#19Kyre Duplessis

Kyre Duplessis is a Versatile WR for Delaware. Kyre's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 97 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyre Duplessis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
63 Receptions863 Rec yards5 Rec TD13.7 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns33 KR yards0 KR TD3 Punt returns73 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume32
  • Explosiveness45
  • Consistency64
  • Pass-Down34
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.31 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs UConn (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3101.31Wk 1 vs Delaware State: +0.76 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Colorado: -0.41 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UConn: +1.31 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida International: +0.55 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Western Kentucky: +0.07 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Jacksonville State: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.94 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Liberty: +0.34 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Sam Houston: -0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wake Forest: +0.09 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UTEP: +0.95 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsDelaware StateW35-1778912.71290.76
2@ColoradoL7-31-8.311313.0013-0.41
3vsUConnW44-415.1916117.91681.31
4@Florida InternationalW38-16-10.534314.30360.55
6vsWestern KentuckyL24-271.623417.00230.07
8@Jacksonville StateL25-38-6.769015.00390.22
9vsMiddle TennesseeW31-28-16.07659.32250.94
10@LibertyL30-59-9.089812.30310.34
11vsLouisiana TechW25-24-1.367813.01240.36
12vsSam HoustonL23-26-27.8273.505-0.27
13@Wake ForestL14-525.73124.0060.09
14vsUTEPW61-31-17.5410426.00470.95
20vsLouisianaW20-13-10.156913.8026

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.1%
Passing plays
18.5%
Rushing plays
0.8%
Standard downs
10.5%
Passing downs
12.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.57
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.55 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.