Skip to content
Kyle Monangai

#5Kyle Monangai

RB·Rutgers·202420231.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Kyle Monangai is a 2-year Featured Back for Rutgers. Kyle's 2024 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 262 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyle Monangai's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1279 Rush yards13 Rush TD256 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
14 Receptions75 Rec yards1 Rec TD5.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency54
  • Receiving22
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency54th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.45 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Akron (SP+ -18).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4500.45Wk 1 vs Howard: +0.16 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Akron: +0.45 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: +0.05 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Washington: +0.11 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Nebraska: -0.09 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wisconsin: -0.13 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCLA: +0.20 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs USC: +0.21 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Maryland: -0.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Illinois: +0.14 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Michigan State: +0.03 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsHowardW44-7191658.711000.16
2vsAkronW49-17-17.9272087.731300.45
4@Virginia TechW26-2310.026843.210.05
5vsWashingtonW21-183.1251325.311500.11
6@NebraskaL7-145.519784.102180-0.09
7vsWisconsinL7-423.019723.81150-0.13
8vsUCLAL32-35-1.3191065.631400.20
9@USCL20-4211.918864.8031400.21
12@MarylandW31-17-3.925973.92130-0.02
13vsIllinoisL31-389.6281224.4032310.14
14@Michigan StateW41-14-4.6311294.210.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.9%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
59.6%
Standard downs
40.5%
Passing downs
20.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.08 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.730−0.402024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Rutgers
2.8
61.3
2024Rutgers
1.9
56.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.