Skip to content
Kyle Monangai

#5Kyle Monangai

RB·Rutgers·202420232.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Kyle Monangai is a 2-year Featured Back for Rutgers. Kyle's 2023 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 249 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyle Monangai's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1262 Rush yards8 Rush TD242 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions78 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume88
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency26
  • Receiving19
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency26th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.64 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6400.64Wk 1 vs Northwestern: +0.21 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Temple: +0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia Tech: +0.64 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Michigan: -0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wagner: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Wisconsin: -0.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Michigan State: +0.36 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Indiana: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Ohio State: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Iowa: -0.27 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Penn State: -0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Maryland: +0.21 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorthwesternW24-7-1.314493.5112000.21
2vsTempleW36-7-21.0281655.910.30
3vsVirginia TechW35-165.8161438.931300.64
4@MichiganL7-3131.311272.50-0.27
5vsWagnerW52-319874.610.26
6@WisconsinL13-249.48162.00-0.31
7vsMichigan StateW27-24-6.8241486.210.36
8@IndianaW31-14-7.4241094.500.22
10vsOhio StateL16-3525.2241596.600.17
11@IowaL0-225.813393.00170-0.27
12@Penn StateL6-2723.516392.40-0.16
13vsMarylandL24-4211.0201185.9033100.21
20vsMiamiW31-249.6251636.512170

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.9%
Passing plays
3.3%
Rushing plays
47.7%
Standard downs
35.5%
Passing downs
20.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.20
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.730−0.402024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Rutgers
2.8
61.3
2024Rutgers
1.9
56.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.