Skip to content
Kenji Christian

#3Kenji Christian

Kenji Christian is a Committee Back for Toledo. Kenji's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 108 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kenji Christian's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
528 Rush yards4 Rush TD105 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
17 Receptions193 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume40
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency27
  • Receiving67
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Morgan State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Kentucky: +0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Kentucky: +0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Morgan State: +0.68 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Western Michigan: -0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Akron: +0.05 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Bowling Green: +0.13 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kent State: +0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Washington State: +0.04 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Northern Illinois: +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Miami (OH): +0.06 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ball State: -0.18 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Central Michigan: -0.09 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@KentuckyL16-241.8351.7022000.05
2vsWestern KentuckyW45-211.615916.100.14
3vsMorgan StateW60-05438.620.68
4@Western MichiganL13-14-1.410424.202130-0.25
5vsAkronW45-3-13.95173.401200.05
7@Bowling GreenL23-28-12.68354.4024100.13
8vsKent StateW45-10-19.3161137.1022100.18
9@Washington StateL7-283.811333.0034700.04
11vsNorthern IllinoisW42-3-16.75336.6123410.34
12@Miami (OH)W24-3-3.47294.101300.06
13vsBall StateW38-9-23.07324.60-0.18
14@Central MichiganW21-3-8.87284.01-0.09
20vsLouisvilleL22-2712.46274.502120

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.1%
Passing plays
5.2%
Rushing plays
22.3%
Standard downs
14.0%
Passing downs
14.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
-0.04
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.