Kareem Hunt is a 3-year Explosive Back for Toledo. Kareem's 2013 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 138 plays — a above-average rate for the RB. Kareem's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.
What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025
How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.
- Usage share (volume)0.52Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
- EPA per play (efficiency)0.10Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
- Total EPA (value)0.41Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons
Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kareem Hunt's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.
Recruiting Profile· Class of 2013
- Stars
- ★★★★★
- 247 composite
- 0.8033
- National rank
- #1,746
- High school
- South
- Hometown
- Willoughby, OH
Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.
2013 Production
Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs RB peers
- Efficiency80
- Volume55
- Explosiveness66
- Consistency0
- Receiving43
Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.
- ▸Above-average efficiency for the RB position (80th percentile).
- ▸Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
- ▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
- ▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.22 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 1.56 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Western Michigan (SP+ -26).
Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value
Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.
Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
Usage & Situational · Pro
- Standard downs
- 0.04
- Passing downs
- 0.89
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.02 / 0.21
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).
Career · rolling EPA, game by game
Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.