Skip to content
Jermaine Brown Jr.
Jermaine Brown Jr.

#1Jermaine Brown Jr.

RB·UAB·2023

Jermaine Brown Jr. is a Pass-Catching Back for UAB. Jermaine's 2023 season ranks in the 65th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 193 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jermaine Brown Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
803 Rush yards12 Rush TD158 Carries5.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
41 Receptions416 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.1 Yards/rec
Returns
15 Kick returns331 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency65
  • Volume67
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency58
  • Receiving78
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)65th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency58th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.07 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs North Carolina A&T.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0701.07Wk 1 vs North Carolina A&T: +1.07 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia Southern: -0.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisiana: -0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia: +0.68 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tulane: +0.19 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs South Florida: +0.91 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UTSA: +0.52 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Memphis: -0.09 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Navy: -0.20 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Temple: +0.33 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs North Texas: +0.73 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorth Carolina A&TW35-66477.8243301.07
2@Georgia SouthernL35-49-5.213342.614200-0.09
3vsLouisianaL21-410.4362.00-0.41
4@GeorgiaL21-4931.25193.8032800.68
5@TulaneL23-352.813483.7064400.19
6vsSouth FloridaW56-35-6.6181166.4422000.91
7@UTSAL20-415.412574.81611600.52
8vsMemphisL21-453.513836.411100-0.09
10vsFlorida AtlanticW45-42-9.422693.1047210.16
11@NavyL6-31-13.715553.70560-0.20
12vsTempleW34-24-21.0201537.7152000.33
13@North TexasL42-45-6.7181166.4214700.73

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.3%
Passing plays
10.0%
Rushing plays
38.9%
Standard downs
27.4%
Passing downs
12.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.