Skip to content
Jarvion Franklin
Jarvion Franklin

#31Jarvion Franklin

RB·Western Michigan·2017201620141.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jarvion Franklin is a 3-year Featured Back for Western Michigan. Jarvion's 2017 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 240 plays — a developing rate for the RB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jarvion Franklin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2014

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8089
National rank
#1,690
High school
Victor J Andrew
Hometown
Bolingbrook, IL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2017 Production

Rushing
1228 Rush yards11 Rush TD235 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions35 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume80
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving17
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.81 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Wagner.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8100.81Wk 1 vs USC: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: +0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Idaho: -0.64 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Wagner: +0.81 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ball State: -0.08 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Buffalo: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Akron: -0.07 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.02 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Central Michigan: +0.39 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kent State: +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northern Illinois: +0.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Toledo: +0.17 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@USCL31-4917.912403.30140-0.13
2@Michigan StateL14-2813.86366.001800.18
3vsIdahoW37-28-12.41080.80-0.64
4vsWagnerW49-14141117.920.81
5vsBall StateW55-3-19.711373.41-0.08
6@BuffaloW71-68-11.2371764.8312010.12
7vsAkronL13-14-17.6311304.20-0.07
8@Eastern MichiganW20-17-5.3241044.31140-0.02
10vsCentral MichiganL28-35-8.6262288.821-100.39
11vsKent StateW48-20-20.2221918.710.34
12@Northern IllinoisL31-35-1.4271154.310.02
13@ToledoL10-376.615523.500.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.0%
Passing plays
2.6%
Rushing plays
43.4%
Standard downs
32.8%
Passing downs
17.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.48 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.960−0.7820162017
EPA per play · 2014 — 2017 · 38 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Western Michigan
4.4
86.0
2016Western Michigan
2.0
61.6
2017Western Michigan
1.8
50.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.