Skip to content
Jaden Barnes

#1Jaden Barnes

Jaden Barnes is a Versatile WR for App State. Jaden's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 81 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaden Barnes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
55 Receptions608 Rec yards7 Rec TD11.1 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns1 KR yards0 KR TD16 Punt returns154 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume33
  • Explosiveness27
  • Consistency63
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.29 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.86 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Southern Miss (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.3400.722.4
Chris TyreeNotre Dame0.3100.623.6
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8600.86Wk 1 vs Charlotte: +0.78 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Lindenwood: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Southern Miss: +0.86 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Oregon State: -0.09 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Georgia State: +0.32 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Old Dominion: +0.42 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Georgia Southern: +0.54 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs James Madison: -0.44 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCharlotteW34-11-26.7613422.31590.78
2vsLindenwoodW20-138718.91210.29
3@Southern MissL22-38-7.11013213.21420.86
6vsOregon StateW27-23-15.9155.005-0.09
7@Georgia StateW41-20-24.52136.51110.32
8vsCoastal CarolinaL37-45-15.15275.4180.18
9@Old DominionL21-245.99637.01180.42
11vsGeorgia SouthernL23-25-9.41316012.31340.54
12@James MadisonL10-5812.3133.003-0.44

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.7%
Passing plays
19.7%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
10.3%
Passing downs
14.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.66
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.