Skip to content
Jack Endries
Jack Endries

#88Jack Endries

TE·California·2024

Jack Endries is a Versatile TE for California. Jack's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 52 plays — a elite rate for the TE.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jack Endries's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
56 Receptions623 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.1 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns4 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume20
  • Explosiveness28
  • Consistency87
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.43 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 2.87 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Florida State (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.870−2.87Wk 2 vs Auburn: +1.14 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Florida State: +2.87 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Miami: +1.86 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Pittsburgh: +1.72 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs NC State: +0.89 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oregon State: +1.04 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Wake Forest: +0.62 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Syracuse: +1.51 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Stanford: +1.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs SMU: +2.05 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2@AuburnW21-149.53237.7081.14
3vsSan Diego StateW31-10-15.43217.008—
4@Florida StateL9-14-3.222412.00132.87
6vsMiamiL38-3921.637826.01571.86
7@PittsburghL15-174.9811914.91271.72
8vsNC StateL23-243.9910111.20180.89
9vsOregon StateW44-7-6.76559.20151.04
11@Wake ForestW46-36-5.75397.80120.62
12vsSyracuseL25-335.545012.50201.51
13vsStanfordW24-21-8.25459.00211.10
14@SMUL6-3817.5177.0072.05
20vsUNLVL13-249.37618.7022—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.1%
Passing plays
12.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
7.5%
Passing downs
6.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.99
Passing downs
1.57
Pass / Rush EPA
1.19 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.