Skip to content
I'Tavius Mathers
I'Tavius Mathers

#4I'Tavius Mathers

RB·Middle Tennessee·20163.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

I'Tavius Mathers is a Pass-Catching Back for Middle Tennessee. I'Tavius's 2016 season ranks in the 60th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 279 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So I'Tavius Mathers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1561 Rush yards17 Rush TD232 Carries6.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
66 Receptions633 Rec yards3 Rec TD9.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness74
  • Consistency74
  • Receiving76
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.93 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic (SP+ -14).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9300.93Wk 1 vs Alabama A&M: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Vanderbilt: +0.20 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Bowling Green: +0.48 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.59 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs North Texas: -0.06 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Western Kentucky: +0.49 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Missouri: +0.32 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Florida International: +0.42 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UTSA: +0.32 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Marshall: -0.23 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Charlotte: +0.06 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.93 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Hawai'i: +0.31 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAlabama A&MW55-07628.9132000.52
2@VanderbiltL24-47-1.213655.0066300.20
3@Bowling GreenW41-21-6.6271575.83410310.48
4vsLouisiana TechW38-343.1211637.8357410.59
5@North TexasW30-13-14.6241355.61270-0.06
7vsWestern KentuckyL43-4415.5221436.5273500.49
8@MissouriW51-45-1.0282157.7184810.32
9@Florida InternationalW42-35-19.0141128.0166900.42
10vsUTSAL25-45-11.215936.2086300.32
11@MarshallL17-42-12.715453.015270-0.23
12@CharlotteW38-31-20.9161016.3064300.06
13vsFlorida AtlanticW77-56-14.11821311.8323700.93
1vsHawai'iL35-52-10.112574.8144400.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.3%
Passing plays
13.1%
Rushing plays
57.5%
Standard downs
37.5%
Passing downs
18.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.34
Passing downs
0.25
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.040−0.35
EPA per play · 2016 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.