Skip to content
Frank Gore Jr.

#3Frank Gore Jr.

RB·Southern Miss·202320223.6 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Frank Gore Jr. is a 2-year Pass-Catching Back for Southern Miss. Frank's 2023 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 241 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Frank Gore Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
2/16 Comp/Att18 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT12.5% Comp %
Rushing
1131 Rush yards10 Rush TD231 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions221 Rec yards3 Rec TD8.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume88
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency53
  • Receiving76
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.33 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.61 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs App State (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6100.61Wk 1 vs Alcorn State: +0.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida State: -0.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulane: -0.39 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas State: +0.28 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Texas State: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Old Dominion: -0.17 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs South Alabama: +0.07 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs App State: +0.61 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UL Monroe: +0.50 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisiana: +0.50 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mississippi State: +0.09 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Troy: +0.36 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAlcorn StateW40-146294.813710.47
2@Florida StateL13-6619.411312.80170-0.16
3vsTulaneL3-212.813161.201150-0.39
4@Arkansas StateL37-44-6.3201326.611100.28
5vsTexas StateL36-50-1.6241235.123400.13
6vsOld DominionL13-17-10.129662.301160-0.17
8@South AlabamaL3-555.112373.1022200.07
9@App StateL38-483.82424710.3211300.61
10vsUL MonroeW24-7-21.6241315.5123600.50
11@LouisianaW34-310.4331584.8221210.50
12@Mississippi StateL20-410.522663.0052910.09
13vsTroyL17-359.813957.3155900.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.9%
Passing plays
12.9%
Rushing plays
46.5%
Standard downs
33.2%
Passing downs
26.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.24 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.522023
EPA per play · 2022 — 2023 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Southern Miss
2.8
57.4
2023Southern Miss
3.6
66.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.