Skip to content
Frank Gore Jr.

#3Frank Gore Jr.

RB·Southern Miss·202320222.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Frank Gore Jr. is a 2-year Featured Back for Southern Miss. Frank's 2022 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 214 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Frank Gore Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
7/14 Comp/Att179 Pass yards3 Pass TD0 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
1382 Rush yards9 Rush TD228 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions219 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume75
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency63
  • Receiving63
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.37 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Rice (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9000.90Wk 1 vs Liberty: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Miami: -0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern State: +0.78 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tulane: -0.19 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Troy: -0.11 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Arkansas State: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Texas State: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisiana: +0.77 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Georgia State: +0.12 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Alabama: +0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UL Monroe: +0.61 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Rice: +0.90 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLibertyL27-29-1.5321785.620.20
2@MiamiL7-30-2.77101.402130-0.32
3vsNorthwestern StateW64-1078211.7111100.78
4@TulaneW27-2412.416442.803140-0.19
6@TroyL10-278.115674.50-0.11
7vsArkansas StateW20-19-13.019965.1122400.34
8@Texas StateW20-14-11.520914.6012100.21
9vsLouisianaW39-242.023873.801200.77
10vsGeorgia StateL14-42-3.311877.910.12
11@Coastal CarolinaL23-260.613463.5059000.34
12vsSouth AlabamaL20-2710.820663.3121800.18
13@UL MonroeW20-10-15.7241998.3122600.61
1vsRiceW38-24-15.22132915.720.90

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.4%
Passing plays
9.1%
Rushing plays
41.5%
Standard downs
30.9%
Passing downs
17.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.65
Pass / Rush EPA
0.82 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.030−0.522023
EPA per play · 2022 — 2023 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Southern Miss
2.8
57.4
2023Southern Miss
3.6
66.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.