Skip to content
Drew Allar

#15Drew Allar

QB·Penn State·202420238.0 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Drew Allar is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Penn State. Drew's 2024 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 487 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Drew Allar's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
262/394 Comp/Att3327 Pass yards24 Pass TD8 INT66.5% Comp %
Rushing
302 Rush yards6 Rush TD96 Carries3.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch99
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.06 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Kent State (SP+ -33).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0601.06Wk 1 vs West Virginia: +0.99 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bowling Green: +0.50 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Kent State: +1.06 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Illinois: +0.08 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UCLA: +0.64 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs USC: +0.41 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Wisconsin: +0.28 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Ohio State: -0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Washington: +0.53 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Purdue: +0.83 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Minnesota: +0.28 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Maryland: +0.47 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Oregon: +0.36 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@West VirginiaW34-122.111/172163098.34400.99
2vsBowling GreenW34-27-1.813/202042165.5710.50
4vsKent StateW56-0-33.017/213093092.72611.06
5vsIllinoisW21-79.615/211350080.41500.08
6vsUCLAW27-11-1.317/242371091.7-310.64
7@USCW33-3011.930/433912382.73200.41
9@WisconsinW28-133.014/181481053.7800.28
10vsOhio StateL13-2031.212/201460129.2310-0.14
11vsWashingtonW35-63.120/282201094.11200.53
12@PurdueW49-10-16.217/192473088.32200.83
13@MinnesotaW26-2510.421/282441083.3810.28
14vsMarylandW44-7-3.917/261711074.72310.47
15vsOregonL37-4526.020/39226325410.36
20vsNotre DameL24-2723.912/231350169.3170
20vsBoise StateW31-1410.113/251713045.0-40
20vsSMUW38-1017.513/221270056.3100

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.6%
Passing plays
90.3%
Rushing plays
13.1%
Standard downs
40.3%
Passing downs
63.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.58
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / 0.47

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.180−0.262024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 29 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Penn State
7.5
229.2
2024Penn State
8.0
262.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.