Skip to content
Dominic Lovett

#6Dominic Lovett

Dominic Lovett is a Slot Specialist WR for Georgia. Dominic's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 80 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dominic Lovett's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
59 Receptions607 Rec yards6 Rec TD10.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume24
  • Explosiveness22
  • Consistency69
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.66 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Tennessee Tech.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6601.66Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.21 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tennessee Tech: +1.66 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kentucky: +1.10 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Alabama: -0.12 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Auburn: +1.27 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Mississippi State: +0.90 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Texas: -0.21 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Florida: +1.00 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ole Miss: +0.79 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tennessee: +0.80 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Massachusetts: +1.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia Tech: +0.15 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Texas: -0.59 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsClemsonW34-313.333311.00150.21
2vsTennessee TechW48-333311.01121.66
3@KentuckyW13-125.568914.80331.10
5@AlabamaL34-4125.06599.8032-0.12
6vsAuburnW31-139.54389.51131.27
7vsMississippi StateW41-31-4.155010.00190.90
8@TexasW30-1524.14358.8017-0.21
10vsFloridaW34-2013.87527.41171.00
11@Ole MissL10-2827.944110.30200.79
12vsTennesseeW31-1722.035919.70380.80
13vsMassachusettsW59-21-21.933511.71161.23
14vsGeorgia TechW44-421.95479.42170.15
15vsTexasW22-1924.1300.004-0.59
20vsNotre DameL10-2323.933612.0019

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.5%
Passing plays
14.9%
Rushing plays
0.5%
Standard downs
6.8%
Passing downs
12.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.75
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / -2.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.