Skip to content
Darian Mensah

#10Darian Mensah

QB·Duke·202520247.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Darian Mensah is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Duke. Darian's 2025 season ranks in the 65th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 542 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Darian Mensah's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
334/500 Comp/Att3973 Pass yards34 Pass TD6 INT66.8% Comp %
Rushing
-32 Rush yards1 Rush TD59 Carries-0.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency65
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat23
  • Consistency90
  • Clutch75
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)65th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency90th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5900.59Wk 1 vs Elon: +0.58 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois: +0.34 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulane: +0.32 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs NC State: +0.50 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Syracuse: +0.59 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs California: +0.33 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: +0.46 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Clemson: +0.49 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UConn: +0.35 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia: +0.05 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs North Carolina: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wake Forest: +0.42 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Virginia: +0.43 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsElonW45-1727/343893068.8-1000.58
2vsIllinoisL19-4512.923/343342168.4200.34
3@TulaneL27-346.330/513133171.0200.32
4vsNC StateW45-334.819/282693088.2-200.50
5@SyracuseW38-3-13.122/282682088.1-2200.59
6@CaliforniaW45-21-3.222/302652086.6-1800.33
8vsGeorgia TechL18-279.332/443732061.0-1300.46
10@ClemsonW46-459.527/413614091.4-600.49
11@UConnL34-375.122/312223274.8300.35
12vsVirginiaL17-3411.118/352131030.4-400.05
13@North CarolinaW32-25-6.620/331751084.62700.32
14vsWake ForestW49-325.724/352682090.1-1210.42
15vsVirginiaW27-2011.119/251962182.1000.43
20vsArizona StateW42-393.929/513274160.5210

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.0%
Passing plays
98.5%
Rushing plays
8.3%
Standard downs
49.9%
Passing downs
73.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.500−0.182025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024Tulane
7.0
188.0
2025Duke
7.7
206.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.