Skip to content
Cole McDonald

#13Cole McDonald

QB·Hawai'i·201920187.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Cole McDonald is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Hawai'i. Cole's 2018 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 571 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cole McDonald's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
285/484 Comp/Att3875 Pass yards36 Pass TD10 INT58.9% Comp %
Rushing
346 Rush yards4 Rush TD134 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat66
  • Consistency75
  • Clutch57
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.35 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Colorado State (SP+ -10).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8000.80Wk 1 vs Colorado State: +0.80 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Navy: +0.80 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rice: +0.61 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Army: +0.34 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Duquesne: +0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs San José State: +0.25 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs BYU: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Nevada: +0.10 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Fresno State: +0.39 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Utah State: +0.05 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs UNLV: -0.01 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San Diego State: +0.51 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.06 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Colorado StateW43-34-10.326/374183097.69620.80
1vsNavyW59-41-10.230/4142860-1400.80
2vsRiceW43-29-26.422/33319403600.61
3@ArmyL21-28-1.520/32321201900.34
4vsDuquesneW42-2124/40273515600.26
5@San José StateW44-41-17.134/57341412700.25
7@BYUL23-496.222/38248212200.26
8vsNevadaL22-40-0.519/37259302100.10
9@Fresno StateL20-5017.417/28225116200.39
10vsUtah StateL17-5614.218/45331221700.05
12vsUNLVW35-28-11.114/3017502241-0.01
13@San Diego StateW31-306.029/4645230-310.51
1vsLouisiana TechL14-31-6.910/208512-170-0.06

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
67.8%
Passing plays
92.6%
Rushing plays
29.9%
Standard downs
64.3%
Passing downs
74.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.880−0.152019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Hawai'i
7.3
263.8
2019Hawai'i
6.1
258.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.