#8Chandler Harvin

WR·Delaware·2023

Chandler Harvin is a Versatile WR for Delaware.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chandler Harvin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving

26 Receptions375 Rec yards4 Rec TD14.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume15
Explosiveness49
Consistency80
Pass-Down100

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.54 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 3.12 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Montana.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · EPA per play, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	EPA/play	Pass	Rush
1	Stony Brook	—	—	1.33	1.33	—
3	Saint Francis	—	—	0.90	0.90	—
6	Duquesne	—	—	0.88	0.88	—
11	Campbell	—	—	0.50	0.50	—
13	Lafayette	—	—	1.10	1.10	—
14	Montana	—	—	3.12	3.12	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

5.3%

Passing plays

9.6%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

6.2%

Passing downs

2.7%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.87
Passing downs: 4.55
Pass / Rush EPA: 1.28 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).