Skip to content
Cameren Smith

#25Cameren Smith

Cameren Smith is a Pass-Catching Back for Charlotte. Cameren's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 63 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cameren Smith's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
220 Rush yards0 Rush TD62 Carries3.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions57 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.2 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns15 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume33
  • Explosiveness10
  • Consistency9
  • Receiving71
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency9th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3800.38Wk 1 vs App State: -0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina: -0.11 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Monmouth: +0.29 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Rice: -0.09 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs South Florida: +0.06 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Army: -0.38 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Temple: -0.30 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs East Carolina: +0.17 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTSA: +0.11 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Tulane: -0.17 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsApp StateL11-34-11.4520.40150-0.29
2vsNorth CarolinaL3-20-6.6351.70-0.11
3vsMonmouthW42-356223.7011700.29
4vsRiceL17-28-14.87284.00140-0.09
6@South FloridaL26-5411.69273.000.06
7@ArmyL7-240.8122.00290-0.38
8vsTempleL14-49-5.111383.50380-0.30
9vsNorth TexasL20-5413.8
11@East CarolinaL22-488.05357.001800.17
12vsUTSAL7-283.79374.100.11
14@TulaneL0-276.36244.00260-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.7%
Passing plays
4.6%
Rushing plays
20.1%
Standard downs
14.5%
Passing downs
6.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.00
Passing downs
-0.29
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.20 / -0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.