Skip to content
Caleb Coombs

#16Caleb Coombs

Caleb Coombs is a Versatile WR for Jacksonville State. Caleb's 2025 season ranks in the 67th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 52 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Caleb Coombs's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
37 Receptions277 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency67
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness3
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)67th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.47 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.19 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Liberty (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Amare JonesTulane0.1800.012.8
Brandon ChatmanNavy0.2300.612.0
Justin LynchTemple0.2400.315.1
Justin LynchNorthern Illinois0.2300.715.2
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.2200.815.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.1902.19Wk 1 vs UCF: -0.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Liberty: +2.19 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Southern: +0.66 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Murray State: +0.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Southern Miss: -0.37 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Sam Houston: +0.62 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Delaware: +0.16 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.71 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTEP: +0.32 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kennesaw State: +1.47 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida International: +0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Western Kentucky: -0.48 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Kennesaw State: -0.91 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@UCFL10-17-1.2231.504-0.48
2vsLibertyW34-24-9.022412.00132.19
3@Georgia SouthernL34-41-9.46589.70160.66
4vsMurray StateW45-105479.40210.08
5@Southern MissL25-42-7.12168.009-0.37
7vsSam HoustonW29-27-27.8122.0020.62
8vsDelawareW38-25-10.95295.80240.16
10@Middle TennesseeW24-21-16.0-0.71
11@UTEPW30-27-17.55428.40140.32
12vsKennesaw StateW35-26-5.411414.00141.47
13@Florida InternationalL21-27-10.56406.70110.19
14vsWestern KentuckyW37-341.6122.002-0.48
15vsKennesaw StateL15-19-5.4100.000-0.91

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.9%
Passing plays
16.5%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
5.2%
Passing downs
7.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.02
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / -1.36

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.