Skip to content
Caden Williams

#21Caden Williams

Caden Williams is a Committee Back for Liberty. Caden's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 53 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Caden Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
243 Rush yards0 Rush TD56 Carries4.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume35
  • Explosiveness26
  • Consistency35
  • Receiving0
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency35th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.51 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs Maine: +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Jacksonville State: -0.03 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Bowling Green: +0.26 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs James Madison: -0.65 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Old Dominion: -0.05 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs UTEP: -0.35 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Delaware: -0.63 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDEPA/play
1vsMaineW28-79525.800.28
2@Jacksonville StateL24-34-6.78394.90-0.03
3@Bowling GreenL13-23-12.63268.700.26
4vsJames MadisonL13-3112.3410.30-0.65
5@Old DominionL7-215.918854.70-0.05
7@UTEPW19-8-17.512363.00-0.35
10vsDelawareW59-30-10.9242.00-0.63

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.2%
Passing plays
0.0%
Rushing plays
20.5%
Standard downs
12.6%
Passing downs
11.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.11
Passing downs
0.02
Pass / Rush EPA
— / -0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.