Skip to content
Brayden Roggow

#6Brayden Roggow

QB·Akron·2025

Brayden Roggow is a Volume Passer for Akron.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brayden Roggow's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
11/17 Comp/Att91 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT64.7% Comp %
Rushing
10 Rush yards0 Rush TD3 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

13
Attempts
3.7y
Avg depth
4.8y
After catch
92%
Catch rate

The ball travels 3.7 yards in the air on an average throw 4.8 yards shorter than the median. Another 4.8 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
8
100% · 71y
3
100% · 22y
2
50% · 7y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume29
  • Dual-Threat20
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch40
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 0.41 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Massachusetts (SP+ -37).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4100.41Wk 4 vs Duquesne: +0.16 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Toledo: +0.21 EPA/play5Wk 11 vs Massachusetts: +0.41 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
4vsDuquesneW51-73/4300018.01000.16
5@ToledoL3-456.07/12510073.50.21
11vsMassachusettsW44-10-36.61/1100095.50.41

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.1%
Passing plays
21.0%
Rushing plays
2.6%
Standard downs
7.7%
Passing downs
16.1%

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.