Skip to content
Brad Kaaya

#15Brad Kaaya

QB·Miami·2016201520148.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Brad Kaaya is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Miami. Brad's 2016 season ranks in the 43th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 451 plays — a developing rate for the QB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brad Kaaya's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2014

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9375
National rank
#142
High school
Chaminade
Hometown
West Hills, CA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2016 Production

Passing
261/421 Comp/Att3532 Pass yards27 Pass TD7 INT62.0% Comp %
Rushing
-136 Rush yards1 Rush TD37 Carries-3.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency43
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat65
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch88
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)43th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Georgia Tech (SP+ 8).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8400.84Wk 1 vs Florida A&M: +0.59 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs App State: +0.59 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Georgia Tech: +0.84 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida State: +0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs North Carolina: +0.06 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Virginia Tech: +0.18 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Notre Dame: +0.28 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Pittsburgh: +0.49 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Virginia: +0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs NC State: +0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Duke: +0.71 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs West Virginia: +0.39 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida A&MW70-312/181354082.1-800.59
2vsFlorida AtlanticW38-10-14.117/311910218.3300.13
3@App StateW45-109.221/273683195.6-800.59
5@Georgia TechW35-217.813/192411086.80.84
6vsFlorida StateL19-2024.019/322142148.7-1400.24
7vsNorth CarolinaL13-2015.916/312240025.1-1700.06
8@Virginia TechL16-3715.223/383232143.2-5500.18
9@Notre DameL27-3015.726/422881153.6-3500.28
10vsPittsburghW51-2813.132/473564084.71710.49
11@VirginiaW34-14-3.814/292282136.9-400.07
12@NC StateW27-139.422/382860051.5-1400.26
13vsDukeW40-21-2.822/353964091.3200.71
1vsWest VirginiaW31-1411.324/342824080.5-300.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
51.8%
Passing plays
98.9%
Rushing plays
3.4%
Standard downs
46.0%
Passing downs
63.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.160−0.5220152016
EPA per play · 2014 — 2016 · 38 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014Miami
9.0
212.2
2015Miami
7.1
187.2
2016Miami
8.6
223.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.