Skip to content
Bill Davis

#32Bill Davis

Bill Davis is a Committee Back for Louisiana. Bill's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 159 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bill Davis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
763 Rush yards6 Rush TD158 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions79 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume55
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving40
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.40 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs McNeese.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5100.51Wk 1 vs Rice: +0.16 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs McNeese: +0.40 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Missouri: -0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.24 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Marshall: -0.09 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs James Madison: -0.35 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Southern Miss: +0.02 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Troy: -0.51 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Alabama: +0.09 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas State: -0.07 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Arkansas State: -0.19 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UL Monroe: +0.04 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsRiceL12-14-14.811585.301700.16
2vsMcNeeseW34-10191326.921600.40
3@MissouriL10-5214.4610.20-0.41
4@Eastern MichiganL31-34-14.711787.110.24
5vsMarshallW54-51-4.514453.201160-0.09
7@James MadisonL14-2412.39212.30-0.35
8vsSouthern MissL10-22-7.114624.400.02
9@TroyL23-35-4.89161.80-0.51
10@South AlabamaW31-22-12.711565.101200.09
11vsTexas StateW42-392.318874.81180-0.07
13@Arkansas StateW34-30-8.811575.21170-0.19
14vsUL MonroeW30-27-21.6151268.4143300.04
20vsDelawareL13-20-10.910242.40

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.4%
Passing plays
4.3%
Rushing plays
31.2%
Standard downs
21.9%
Passing downs
14.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.04
Passing downs
0.03
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / -0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.