Skip to content
Ashton Jeanty

#2Ashton Jeanty

RB·Boise State·202420232.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Ashton Jeanty is a 2-year Pass-Catching Back for Boise State. Ashton's 2023 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 250 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ashton Jeanty's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1351 Rush yards14 Rush TD221 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
43 Receptions569 Rec yards5 Rec TD13.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume92
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency76
  • Receiving77
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.18 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.83 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Washington (SP+ 16).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8300.83Wk 1 vs Washington: +0.83 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UCF: +0.50 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs North Dakota: -0.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs San Diego State: +0.77 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Memphis: +0.34 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs San José State: -0.23 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Colorado State: +0.42 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Wyoming: +0.54 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Utah State: +0.51 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Air Force: +0.75 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UNLV: +0.34 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@WashingtonL19-5616.410444.41410910.83
2vsUCFL16-183.4241154.8059710.50
3vsNorth DakotaW42-1816432.735300-0.18
4@San Diego StateW34-31-10.3232058.9244900.77
5@MemphisL32-353.523823.6255320.34
6vsSan José StateW35-27-3.4241677.002160-0.23
7@Colorado StateL30-31-8.9312126.8354200.42
9vsWyomingW32-7-3.66538.800.54
12@Utah StateW45-10-10.912857.1122300.51
13vsAir ForceW27-195.9141077.61511810.75
14@UNLVW44-201.4211537.3121500.34
20vsUCLAL22-359.717855.004170

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.3%
Passing plays
13.6%
Rushing plays
45.1%
Standard downs
37.4%
Passing downs
19.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.33
Passing downs
0.60
Pass / Rush EPA
1.13 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.150−0.432024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Boise State
2.8
62.1
2024Boise State
8.4
169.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.