Skip to content

Konsta Helenius vs Noah Cates

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Konsta Helenius is ahead on 11 of 12 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Konsta Helenius sits in the 83rd percentile, Noah Cates the 13th.

MeasureHeleniusCates
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals10
Assists00
Ice time per game14:5412:29
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3083 pct0.0213 pct
Shot attempts per game3.580 pct1.017 pct
Goals above expected+0.476 pct−0.149 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share62.6%80 pct37.3%19 pct
Chances for per 602.9873 pct1.157 pct
Chances against per 601.7872 pct1.9365 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+1.0099 pct+0.2666 pct
Creates per 60+0.7498 pct−0.0235 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2691 pct+0.2792 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →