Skip to content

Stephen Halliday vs Chris Tanev

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Stephen Halliday is ahead on 7 of 9 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Stephen Halliday sits in the 87th percentile, Chris Tanev the 5th.

MeasureHallidayTanev
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals10
Assists00
Ice time per game9:5318:55
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3387 pct0.015 pct
Shot attempts per game2.560 pct0.34 pct
Goals above expected+0.374 pct0.062 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—39.1%23 pct
Chances for per 60—1.9535 pct
Chances against per 60—3.0421 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4383 pct+0.2969 pct
Creates per 60+0.5293 pct−0.2112 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0926 pct+0.4999 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →