Skip to content

John Marino vs Tyler Kleven

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

John Marino is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: John Marino sits in the 40th percentile, Tyler Kleven the 3rd.

MeasureMarinoKleven
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals00
Assists10
Ice time per game20:5922:32
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0316 pct0.014 pct
Shot attempts per game1.326 pct1.017 pct
Goals above expected−0.150 pct0.064 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share53.2%54 pct52.9%53 pct
Chances for per 602.4051 pct2.1743 pct
Chances against per 602.1157 pct1.9364 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.0340 pct−0.483 pct
Creates per 60−0.1022 pct−0.482 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1373 pct0.0041 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →